In the article Sisters in Arms by James Dao, talks about the problem of the U.S military not giving women's the same opportunity that the males are serving.
In the article" Sisters In Arms" spoke about how there are many females that decide to put themselves and their families in risk by joining the U.S army. Well the reason why I said that is because this article is trying to say that women are not physically strong and mantel y strong enough to be in the army basically what they are trying to say is that women don't have what it takes to be in the army.
There was another quote from the article that stood out to me which was , " Of the 2.5 million Americans who have served in both wars since 2001, about 12 percent have been women". This quote just give a little summary of how many woman that were involved in the war during the year of 2001.
I made a connection with this article because I feel that there are jobs for everyone, and I feel that woman should not be in the army because they are ladies, I'm not just saying that because they are woman , but because I feel that its a man job. I just feel that man should be the one holding and carrying guns, not woman, I feel that women's should be home and taking care of their children's.
I'm not saying that womens shouldnt be in the war because they dont have what it takes but , because I just feel that womans are better off not holding guns .
I really dont have any questons about this article but , I do think that this article really got me thinking about how this womens in arms is going to turn out.
So WHY do you think that some women should not have the choice or opportunity to serve their country? It seems strange that you would want to limit a woman's choices. 85
ReplyDelete